Apple Stock Under Scrutiny
Apple stock closed 4% lower at $171.3 following DOJ’s antitrust lawsuit, remaining one of the Magnificent Seven laggards in 2024, with the S&P 500 gaining 10%.
What is the matter?
The Department of Justice has filed a lawsuit against Apple, accusing the company of monopolizing the iPhone ecosystem, leading to its “astronomical valuation” at the expense of consumers, developers, and phone manufacturers. The suit has sent Apple stock lower, and if the US government prevails, they may consider structural relief, including breaking up the company. The lawsuit claims Apple’s anti-competitive behavior affects advertising, browser, FaceTime, and news services.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed a lawsuit against Apple, accusing the company of maintaining its smartphone monopoly by hindering cross-platform messaging apps, restricting compatibility with third-party wallets and smartwatches, and obstructing non-App Store programs and cloud streaming services. The lawsuit poses a significant threat to Apple’s ecosystem, as it argues that regulatory compliance is costly, could limit its ability to launch new products or services, and might reduce consumer demand. A court ruling against Apple could lead to significant changes in its key revenue sources, including the iPhone, Apple Watch, and its growing services division.
What is Experts says?
The lawsuit’s unveiling has sparked discussions among Wall Street analysts about its potential impact on Apple’s stock and operations.
HSBC predicts that if the Department of Justice proves its case, Apple may change its operations, similar to Europe’s Digital Market Act, which forced Apple to drastically alter its App Store terms and conditions, including allowing developers to distribute apps on alternative marketplaces or enabling NFC technology in banking and wallet apps.
Evercore suggests that the current US anti-trust law, which relies on quantifiable market definitions, may pose a challenge as it makes it difficult to argue Apple operates a monopoly using market definitions or consumer harm standards.
Bernstein: The DoJ’s charges against Apple are primarily focused on iPhone, but the remediation is unlikely to significantly impact Apple financially or undermining the iPhone franchise. The worst case is Apple paying a fine and loosening competition restrictions across the iOS platform, which could have limited impact on iPhone user retention or Services revenues.
Morgan Stanley argues that Apple’s competitive edge stems from its seamless integration of hardware, software, and services, creating an unmatched closed ecosystem of offerings. They argue this innovation, not monopolistic practices, benefits consumers.
Wedbush: Apple is expected to settle a long-running legal case, pay a substantial fine, and eventually compromise with developers on the App Store structure, despite the potential for years-long litigation and potential business model changes.
Must read book about investing – check here AApple Stock Under Scrutiny pple Stock Under Scrutiny Apple Stock Under Scrutiny Apple Stock Under Scrutiny Apple Stock Under Scrutiny Apple Stock Under Scrutiny
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed a lawsuit against Apple, accusing the company of maintaining its smartphone monopoly by hindering cross-platform messaging apps, restricting compatibility with third-party wallets and smartwatches, and obstructing non-App Store programs and cloud streaming services. The lawsuit poses a significant threat to Apple’s ecosystem, as it argues that regulatory compliance is costly, could limit its ability to launch new products or services, and might reduce consumer demand. A court ruling against Apple could lead to significant changes in its key revenue sources, including the iPhone, Apple Watch, and its growing services division.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed a lawsuit against Apple, accusing the company of maintaining its smartphone monopoly by hindering cross-platform messaging apps, restricting compatibility with third-party wallets and smartwatches, and obstructing non-App Store programs and cloud streaming services. The lawsuit poses a significant threat to Apple’s ecosystem, as it argues that regulatory compliance is costly, could limit its ability to launch new products or services, and might reduce consumer demand. A court ruling against Apple could lead to significant changes in its key revenue sources, including the iPhone, Apple Watch, and its growing services division.